We build AI agents and software for law firms and in-house teams: contracts checked against your playbook, answers drawn from your own files with sources linked, and case chronologies drafted, with lawyers deciding everything.
The agent does the legwork. A person makes the one decision that’s theirs.
A client sends Mehra & Associates a supply agreement drafted by the buyer’s side. The agent checks each clause against the firm’s playbook: indemnity and governing law are within it, payment at 90 days gets a tracked change to 45, and the supplier’s liability is uncapped. The associate picks the firm’s fallback, a cap at 12 months’ fees, and the redline goes in with a comment citing the playbook rule.
Compares each clause with your standard and fallback positions and drafts a redline, with a comment explaining every change. The lawyer accepts, edits or rejects each one.
Answers from the firm’s own opinions, briefs and notes, quoting and linking the exact paragraphs it used. It respects matter access and ethical walls, and says it found nothing rather than guess.
Builds chronologies, document indexes and issue summaries from the case file, with every entry linked to its source, for lawyers to review. Privilege and relevance calls stay with your lawyers.
Anything outside your rules waits for a person, and every step is on record.
Provakil, Legistify, SpotDraft and others you may run. We check what each allows first, and nothing gets ripped out.
Works with: Provakil, Legistify, SpotDraft, Leegality, TallyPrime, Zoho Books, WhatsApp Business, Clio, MyCase, Filevine, iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, Intapp, Aderant, Relativity, DocuSign, Ironclad.
We fix these one workflow at a time.
Then we tell you plainly what will work well, what needs a person, and what isn’t worth automating.
Cause lists, orders and hearing notes turned into matter updates.
Checks each evening’s cause lists for your active matters, from the lists your clerk downloads or a legal-data service you subscribe to, reads new orders for directions and dates, and turns the advocate’s voice note after a hearing into a matter update and a draft client update. A lawyer checks every date against the court record before it reaches the calendar or the client.
Dates and obligations from signed contracts, reviewed before reminders start.
Reads signed contracts for renewal dates, notice periods, payment terms and other obligations, and puts them in a register. A lawyer reviews each entry before any reminder goes live.
First drafts from your own templates, with each clause’s source.
Drafts agreements, notices, applications and board resolutions from your templates and past matters, filled from the intake, and shows which precedent each clause came from. Nothing leaves without a lawyer’s review.
Citations checked against the source, with doubts flagged for review.
Checks that each cited case exists and that quoted passages appear in it, using the official and licensed sources you have access to, and flags anything it can’t verify. Whether an authority still holds and applies is the lawyer’s call.
Due diligence records read into review grids, linked to sources.
Reads the records you supply into review grids, with every entry linked to its page, for your lawyers to assess. Conclusions about title, liability or risk stay with them.
Possible conflicts and related parties found for the partner.
Organises new-matter details and searches your records for possible conflicts, including related companies and spelling variants, for a partner to investigate. It finds possible conflicts; it can’t prove there are none.
Time entries drafted to each client’s rules, for lawyers to submit.
Drafts time entries from calendars, email, documents and call logs, written to each client’s billing rules, and flags block billing and vague entries. Each lawyer reviews and submits their own time.
Every matter’s court, stage, next date and orders in one place.
Every matter with its court, case number, stage, next date, counsel and orders. For firms, and for companies with cases in many forums.
Business teams request contracts through a form, Teams or Slack.
Business teams request contracts through a form, Teams or Slack. Standard NDAs are self-serve; everything else reaches legal with its context attached.
Signed contracts, searchable, with key terms, owners and dates.
Signed contracts, searchable, with key terms, owners and dates.
Confirmed dates sent to calendars and clients.
Approved dates and orders update the matter record, Outlook or Google calendars, and the client by email or WhatsApp.
Each trade marks journal scanned for marks like your clients’.
Scans each new journal for marks that look or sound like your clients’ marks and opens a task with the opposition deadline, for a trade marks lawyer to confirm.
Approved contracts signed, stamped and filed to the matter.
Approved contracts go out for e-signature and e-stamping, and signed copies file themselves to the matter and the repository.
No. It supports document handling, research and drafting for qualified lawyers, and your lawyers advise your clients.
It answers only from sources it can retrieve, links every citation and flags anything it can’t verify. A lawyer still checks each authority, and whether it applies, before relying on it.
Not without your agreement. Before we start, we agree in writing where documents are stored, which services may process them and how they may be used. Access follows matter permissions, and every action is logged.
Each firm’s data is kept separate, access follows matter permissions and ethical walls, and we agree the arrangements in writing before we start.
Usually, yes. We check what each tool allows first, then connect through its API or a file export. Where neither exists, we tell you plainly, and we use court and legal databases only in the ways their terms allow.
No. It does the first pass and the tracking, and your lawyers make every call.
